Files
rdbms-playground/docs/adr/0037-execution-time-mode-side-channel.md
claude@clouddev1 ae57c6fc82 feat: colour output tags by status, not mode — readable error bodies (#10)
The output tag was tinted by submission mode for every line kind, so a
[system] line and an [error] line rendered with an identical leftmost
tag — distinguishable only by body colour. And flooding the whole error
body in red made long messages hard to read.

Colour the tag by message status instead (its OutputKind): [system] →
green, [error] → red; the echo tag keeps the mode tint (ADR-0037's
actual purpose — per-command success rides the ✓/✗ marker). Bodies go
neutral; the error body stays bold for weight (rustc-style: severity-
coloured label, readable bold message). Yields a status traffic-light
matching the ✓/✗ palette.

Narrows ADR-0037's mode side-channel to the echo line it was always for.
ADR-0037 Amendment 1; closes the tag-colour gap ADR-0040 flagged as OOS.
2026-05-31 22:02:12 +00:00

280 lines
14 KiB
Markdown

# ADR-0037: Execution-time mode side-channel (the three-way submission mode)
## Status
Accepted. Design agreed with the user (2026-05-27); the channel is
**implemented and validated end-to-end** by its motivating consumer
(ADR-0038's DSL → SQL teaching echo). The three-way `EffectiveMode`
{ `Simple`, `AdvancedPersistent`, `AdvancedOneShot` } resolves at submit
time in `App::submit` and threads through `Action::ExecuteDsl`
`runtime::spawn_dsl_dispatch`, which gates `echo::echo_for` on it
(handoff-46 commit `04c8e42` shipped the channel + first echo slice;
handoff-47 commit `90479cb` proved it carries the full Bucket A
catalogue). Redeems the follow-up **deferred by ADR-0033 Amendment 3**,
which named this very ADR and its motivating consumer.
## Context
ADR-0033 Amendment 3 ("Execution-time mode is side-channel — deferred
to its own ADR") recorded a requirement and deferred it:
> every command should — at **execution time** — know which of three
> modes it ran under: `simple`, `advanced`, or `advanced-one-shot`
> (the `:` escape from Simple mode, ADR-0003), so execution can adjust
> **output** without changing **identity** (e.g. a Simple-mode
> `create table` echoing the generated SQL when run in Advanced mode,
> while staying silent in Simple mode).
That echo is the **DSL → SQL teaching bridge** (ADR-0030 §10), specified
as its own Phase-5 ADR (ADR-0038). ADR-0038 is the motivating — and, at
time of writing, only — consumer of this side-channel. This ADR
establishes the channel; ADR-0038 consumes it.
### What exists today
- The persistent input mode `Mode` (`src/mode.rs`) is **two-way**:
`Simple` / `Advanced`. Its doc comment is explicit that the one-shot
`:` escape "is handled at submission time in `app::App::submit`, **not
as additional state here**."
- The one-shot `:` is therefore a **transient, per-submission**
property, collapsed to an effective mode at submit time. It is not
persistent state and was deliberately kept out of `Mode`.
- The only mode information that survives past submission is a
**rendering** side-channel: `OutputLine.mode_at_submission: Mode`
(the `[simple]`/`[advanced]` echo-line tag in `ui.rs`). It is two-way
and exists purely to label the input-echo line.
- Neither `Action::ExecuteDsl` nor the database worker
(ADR-0010) carries any mode. Execution is mode-agnostic.
### Why the gap blocks the echo
The teaching echo (ADR-0038) renders the equivalent SQL **beneath the
`[ok]` summary**. That summary is built in the App's outcome handler
(`App::update`, the `Dsl*Succeeded` arms) from the **worker's result
event** — not at dispatch time. At that point:
- The typed `Command` is available (the success events already carry it).
- The submission mode is **not** available. `self.mode` is the *current*
persistent mode, which is unreliable for this purpose: it can change
between submission and outcome, and for a `:` one-shot it never
reflected the effective mode of that single line at all.
So the echo needs the **effective submission mode delivered to
execution/outcome**. And several echo forms (ADR-0038 — auto-resolved
index / relationship names, generated `shortid` values, lossy-conversion
counts) are only knowable **after the worker has run**, so the echo's
data is fundamentally worker-produced. The natural place to gate and
build mode-dependent output is therefore the execution path, with the
mode threaded to it — exactly the side-channel Amendment 3 anticipated.
## Decision
Introduce a **three-way effective submission mode**, computed at submit
time and threaded through the `Action` → worker interface, available at
**execution time** to adjust **output only**. Command identity, dispatch,
and execution semantics are **unchanged** (ADR-0033 Amendment 3: identity
is intrinsic to the mode-rooted grammar path, not a flag).
### 1. A new per-submission enum, distinct from persistent `Mode`
```rust
/// The effective mode of a single submitted line, resolved at submit
/// time. Distinct from the persistent input `Mode` (which stays
/// two-way) because the one-shot `:` escape is a transient per-line
/// property, never persistent state (ADR-0003; `mode.rs`).
pub enum SubmissionMode {
Simple,
Advanced,
AdvancedOneShot,
}
```
**This refines Amendment 3's framing.** Amendment 3 sketched "widening
`Mode` to the three-way distinction." On implementation review, a
**separate enum** is cleaner: `Mode` models *persistent input state*,
and `mode.rs` deliberately keeps the one-shot out of it. Folding a
transient `AdvancedOneShot` into the persistent `Mode` would contradict
that design note and let a non-persistable value leak into persistent-
mode call sites. `SubmissionMode` carries the three-way distinction on
the per-submission channel where it belongs; `Mode` stays two-way and
untouched. The *requirement* Amendment 3 recorded is met; only the
**shape** is refined. (Flagged for `/runda`/user challenge — it is an
internal architecture choice with no user-facing effect.)
The effective mode is resolved at submit time from the persistent
`Mode` plus whether the `:` sigil was used:
- persistent `Simple`, no `:``Simple`
- persistent `Simple`, `:` prefix → `AdvancedOneShot`
- persistent `Advanced``Advanced` (the `:` is a no-op there)
### 2. Threaded through `Action::ExecuteDsl` to the worker
`Action::ExecuteDsl` gains a `submission_mode: SubmissionMode` field;
the worker request mirrors it. Execution thus knows, per command, the
effective mode it ran under. The value is **output-only**: no executor
branches its *effect* on it (that would be a behavioural mode dependency,
which ADR-0033 Amendment 3 forbids — identity and effect are intrinsic).
### 3. The runtime's execution dispatcher produces the echo; the App renders it
For the first consumer (ADR-0038): when the command is a **DSL-form**
command (`Command::CreateTable`/`Insert`/… — *not* the `Sql*` variants)
and `submission_mode` is `Advanced` or `AdvancedOneShot`, the teaching
echo (equivalent SQL + any category-3 expansion data — ADR-0038) is built
from the `Command` **plus the worker's execution result**, and the App
renders it as de-emphasised `OutputLine`(s) beneath `[ok]`. In `Simple`
mode, or for a command typed as SQL, no echo is produced.
**Where it is built (build correction — see Implementation notes).** Not
in the db.rs worker: the worker receives *decomposed* calls, not the
`Command`, so it cannot render `Command → SQL`. The echo is built at the
**runtime's `ExecuteDsl` handler**, the one place where the `Command`,
the threaded `EffectiveMode`, and the worker's result (resolved
auto-names, generated `shortid`s, conversion counts) all converge. This
is still **execution-time aware** — it consumes the execution *results*
it just lives at the dispatch layer, not inside the storage worker.
**Non-interactive re-execution does not echo.** `replay` (ADR-0034)
re-runs recorded commands through the dispatch pipeline in advanced mode
(ADR-0033 Amendment 3) — but a per-line teaching echo there would bury
the replay summary in noise. So replayed lines (and any future
programmatic re-execution) dispatch with a `SubmissionMode` that
**suppresses** mode-dependent output: command *identity* still parses in
advanced mode (Amendment 3, unchanged), but no echo fires. The mechanism
— a fourth non-echoing context, or an `interactive: bool` alongside the
mode — is a build choice; the contract fixed here is *replay is silent*.
### 4. Scope of this ADR
This ADR establishes the channel and the resolution rule **only**. The
echo renderer, its catalogue, and the `Value → SQL-literal` machinery
are ADR-0038. The advanced-mode `ALTER COLUMN` gap-fill the echo relies
on is the ADR-0035 amendment. No echo behaviour is specified here beyond
the gating contract in §3.
## Alternatives considered
- **Widen `Mode` to three-way (Amendment 3's literal sketch).** Avoids a
new type but conflates transient per-submission state with persistent
input state, against `mode.rs`'s explicit design note. Rejected for
§1's separate enum.
- **App-side gating, worker always returns echo data.** Keep the worker
mode-agnostic; have it return echo data on *every* result, and let the
App decide whether to render from `mode_at_submission` + command shape.
Rejected: it computes the echo unconditionally (including in Simple
mode, where it is never shown), does not generalise to other mode-
dependent output, and re-opens exactly the "the echo is purely render-
side" framing the user has twice ruled against — the settled direction
is execution-time mode awareness, per Amendment 3.
## Consequences
- Additive and small: a new enum, one field on `Action::ExecuteDsl` and
the worker request, and the submit-time resolution rule. No change to
parsing, dispatch, command identity, or any executor's effect.
- The persistent `Mode` enum and `OutputLine.mode_at_submission` are
unchanged. (ADR-0038 may enrich the render tag separately; not required
here.)
- Future mode-dependent **output** has a home. Anything touching command
*identity* or *effect* does not belong here (Amendment 3).
- Tests: submit-time resolution for all three cases (incl. `:` one-shot
and the Advanced-mode `:`-is-a-no-op case); the field survives the
`Action` → worker round-trip; a Simple-mode DSL command yields no echo
request while an Advanced / one-shot one does (the gating contract).
## Implementation notes (2026-05-27, during build)
Two refinements found when building, recorded so the ADR matches reality:
- **Reuse the existing `EffectiveMode`, do not add `SubmissionMode`.** The
codebase already has `EffectiveMode { Simple, AdvancedPersistent,
AdvancedOneShot }` (`app.rs`), computed by `effective_mode()` and used
today for the `:` one-shot UI feedback. It is exactly the three-way,
per-submission, *separate-from-`Mode`* enum §1 argued for — so §1's
"new enum" is already satisfied; the build reuses `EffectiveMode`
(`AdvancedPersistent` is the ADR's `Advanced`). No new type.
- **The channel ships with its consumer (merged with ADR-0038).** A
threaded-but-unread `EffectiveMode` on the worker request is dead code,
which this project's `-D warnings` (nursery) rejects. The side-channel
has no consumer other than the echo, so the `Action`→worker threading
is built **together with ADR-0038** rather than as a standalone commit
— the submit-side resolution (which `Action` carries which
`EffectiveMode`) is Tier-1 testable, and the worker-side threading
becomes live + end-to-end testable the moment the echo reads it.
## Amendment 1 — Output tag is colour-coded by status, not mode (2026-05-31, issue #10)
The original side-channel (§ above) exists "purely to label the
**input-echo line**" — the `[simple]`/`[advanced]` tag whose colour
tells the learner which mode their command ran under. In
implementation, however, the tag-colour rule in `render_output_line`
(`src/ui.rs`) was applied to **every** output kind, keyed on
`mode_at_submission` regardless of whether the line was an echo. That
over-applied the channel: a `[system]` line and an `[error]` line —
neither of which is an input echo — both picked up the same mode tint
(blue in simple, orange in advanced). The only thing distinguishing a
routine `[system]` message from an `[error]` was the **body** colour
(green vs red), while the tag — the leftmost glyph the eye lands on —
was identical (issue #10).
That is backwards for the line a learner most needs to spot fastest.
The mode has limited value on an error line; "this is an error" has
high value. And flooding the whole error **body** in red makes a long
message *harder* to read, not easier.
**Change — the status-coloured-tag model.** The output tag is
colour-coded by the message's **status** (its `OutputKind`), and the
**body** is neutral so the message text stays readable:
| Kind | Tag colour | Body |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `Echo` | **mode tint** (`mode_simple`/`mode_advanced`) — *the sole exception* | `theme.fg` / lexed (unchanged); per-command success rides the trailing ✓/✗ (ADR-0040) |
| `System` | `theme.system` (green) | `theme.fg` (was green) |
| `TeachingEcho` | `theme.system` (green — it is a `[system]`-tagged line) | dim prefix + lexed SQL (unchanged) |
| `Error` | `theme.error` (red) | `theme.fg` **+ BOLD** (was red) |
This **narrows** the side-channel to its stated purpose rather than
contradicting it: the mode tint now lives **only** on the echo tag,
where ADR-0037 always said it belonged. Everything else reads as a
status traffic-light — **green tag = ok/info, red tag = error**
which is the same palette as the ✓/✗ echo markers (ADR-0040), so the
whole output surface speaks one colour vocabulary.
**Why bold-neutral for the error body** (not plain, not red). This is
the established diagnostic-rendering convention — `rustc`, `clang`,
`tsc`, and most linters colour the **severity label** and render the
**message** in the default foreground (bold), not a wall of severity
colour. The red moves to the tag (the scan target); the body keeps
weight via BOLD without the readability cost of coloured prose.
**Scope / non-changes.**
- `OutputLine.mode_at_submission` is **unchanged** — still carries the
mode for the echo tag. Only *which kinds consult it for colour* changed.
- The ✓/✗ completion markers (ADR-0040) are untouched — they already
use `theme.system`/`theme.error` directly, and now visually rhyme
with the new tag colours.
- This supersedes the three options sketched in issue #10 (red tag /
amber attention tag / glyph) with a cleaner fourth model that also
fixes body readability and the `[system]` tag in one rule. ADR-0040
had flagged the `[error]`/`[system]` tag colours as orthogonal and
out of its scope (issue #10) — this amendment closes that gap.
**Coverage** (`src/ui.rs` tests): `system_line_renders_green_tag_and_neutral_body`,
`error_line_renders_red_tag_and_bold_neutral_body`,
`echo_tag_keeps_the_mode_tint_not_a_status_colour` (locks the sole
exception across both modes), `teaching_echo_tag_is_green_like_other_system_lines`.
## See also
- ADR-0040 — the ✓/✗ completion markers whose green/red palette the
status tag now matches; it deferred these tag colours as orthogonal
(issue #10), closed by Amendment 1.
- ADR-0033 Amendment 3 — deferred this side-channel; defines the
intrinsic command-identity model this ADR must not disturb.
- ADR-0030 §10 — the DSL → SQL teaching bridge (the motivating consumer).
- ADR-0038 — the teaching echo; the consumer built on this channel.
- ADR-0003 — input modes and the one-shot `:` escape.
- ADR-0010 — the database worker thread this mode is threaded to.