Files
rdbms-playground/tests
claude@clouddev1 c4ee264636 replay: new replay <path> command (A3, U4)
Implements the U4 replay command per handoff §A3:

  replay <path>

Reads <path> and dispatches each non-blank, non-`#`-comment
line through the same DSL pipeline as interactive input.
Aborts at the first per-line failure (parse or runtime),
reporting the line number; previously dispatched commands
stay applied (no rollback) — matches the "I'm replaying my
history" mental model where partial replay is a recoverable
state.

Architecture choices and why:

- **Parsed by the DSL parser** (Command::Replay), not as an
  app-level command alongside `import` / `export`. The
  handoff's implementation sketch was explicit and the
  parsed-AST shape gives us a clean test surface for the
  path-lexing rules. A new `path_literal` parser terminal
  accepts either a single-quoted string (escape rules
  mirror `string_literal` — `''` for a literal quote) or a
  bare run of non-whitespace, with explicit refusal of `'`,
  `(`, `)`, `;` in bare form. Empty paths fail at parse
  time so file-system-layer errors aren't shadowed by
  silly inputs.
- **Routed away from the worker thread.** Command::Replay
  is intercepted in `App::dispatch_dsl` and emitted as
  `Action::Replay` rather than `Action::ExecuteDsl`. Two
  reasons: (1) the worker has no filesystem context, and
  (2) the replay invocation must NOT land in
  `history.log` — otherwise `replay history.log` would
  re-trigger itself recursively. Only the individual
  sub-commands write to history.log via the normal
  per-command persistence path.
- **Inner loop separated from spawn.** `runtime::spawn_replay`
  is a thin tokio::spawn wrapper around `runtime::run_replay`,
  which is `pub` and returns a Vec<AppEvent>. The inner
  function is what tests exercise, sidestepping mpsc plumbing.
- **Relative paths resolve under the project root** so
  `replay history.log` works without ceremony from inside
  any project. Absolute paths pass through unchanged.
- **Nested `replay` is refused.** Allowing `replay foo` from
  inside a replay file invites infinite-loop footguns and
  opens design questions (transitive composition, ordering)
  we'd rather not answer right now. Refusal is explicit.

New plumbing:

- `Command::Replay { path }` AST variant + verb/target_table.
- `Action::Replay { path }` runtime action.
- `AppEvent::ReplayCompleted { path, count }` and
  `AppEvent::ReplayFailed { path, line_number, command, error }`.
- `runtime::run_replay` (public) and `runtime::spawn_replay`.
- App handlers render success as
  `[ok] replay <path> — N command(s) run` and failures as
  `replay <path> failed at line N: <error>` with a
  `  > <command>` echo line for line context. Line 0 is the
  "file open failed" signal — header reads
  `replay <path> failed: <error>` and the echo line is
  suppressed.
- In-app `help` lists the new command with a continuation
  describing comment/blank handling and the relative-path
  rule.

Tests (+20):

- 7 parser tests covering bare/quoted/escaped paths,
  case-insensitive keyword, and refusal cases (no path,
  empty quoted path).
- 9 integration tests in `tests/replay_command.rs`:
  - happy 3-line replay → 3 commands run, state mutated;
  - blank lines + `#` comments skipped;
  - empty file + only-comments file → count 0;
  - missing file → ReplayFailed line_number 0;
  - parse failure mid-replay → reports correct line +
    leaves earlier commands applied + does NOT run later
    lines;
  - runtime failure mid-replay (refers to nonexistent
    table) → reports correct line;
  - nested replay refused;
  - history.log contains per-command entries but NOT the
    `replay …` invocation itself.
- 4 App-level tests: Action::Replay dispatch (not
  ExecuteDsl); ReplayCompleted rendering; ReplayFailed
  rendering with and without line-number context.

541 -> 561 passing, clippy clean with nursery lints,
release build successful.

A future ADR on the parser-as-source-of-truth direction
(handoff §"Pending §3") would bring richer error reporting
for replay parse failures (currently uses the same
single-line wording as interactive parse failures, which is
adequate but not great when a script has many lines around
the failing one).
2026-05-08 15:06:56 +00:00
..